ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the whole genome expression profiles between gastric high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) tissues with cancer and HGIN tissues without cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Gastric specimens from an upper magnifying chromoendoscopic targeted biopsy were collected at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from March 2010 to May 2013. Each of the forceps biopsies from the 21 patients was HGIN,but there were 10 HGIN and 11 HGIN with cancer after the endoscopic submucosal dissection. The whole genome expression profiling was performed on 10 HGIN samples and 11 HGIN with cancer samples using Agilent 4 × 44K Whole Human Genome microarrays. Differentially expressed genes between different types of lesions were identified using an unpaired t-test and corrected with the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate algorithm. A gene ontology(GO)enrichment analysis was performed using the GeneSpring software GX 12.6.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The gene expression patterns were different between HGIN tissues with cancer and HGIN tissues without cancer. There were 470 significantly differentially expressed transcripts between them (P<0.05,Fold Change>2), with 180 up-regulated genes and 290 down-regulated genes in HGIN tissues with cancer. A GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that the most striking over-expressed transcripts in HGIN with cancer were in the category of triglyceride biosynthetic process,acylglycerol biosynthetic process,neutral lipid biosynthetic process,glycerol ether metabolic process,organic ether metabolic process,and glycerolipid metabolic process.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The change of lipid metabolism may contribute to the pathogenesis of gastric cancer at an early stage.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Algorithms , Down-Regulation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genome, Human , Lipid Metabolism , Software , Stomach Diseases , Stomach Neoplasms , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate biomechanical properties of internal fixation after C3 corpectomy and C2-4 anterior fusion with Zephir plate in reconstructing stability of the upper cervical vertebra, and compare them with conventionally used anterior internal fixation after C2-3 intervertebral fusion and posterior internal fixation by C2 transpedicle screws. MethodsSix fresh human upper cervical vertebra specimens (including C2-4) were divided into five groups: the intact specimen group(control group), the incision of the C2-3 group (Hangman group), the posterior internal fixation by C2 transpedicle screw group (posterior fixation group), the anterior internal fixation after C2-3 intervertebral fusion with Zephir plate group (anterior fixation group), and the internal fixation after C3 corpectomy and C2-4 anterior fusion with Zephir plate group (C2-4 incision +internal fixation group). Range of motion (ROM) of the C2-3 and C3-4 segments was tested respectively under 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 N•m moment by measurement system for three-dimensional spinal movement, and the statistical analysis was also conducted. Results(1) C2-3 segment: ROM of anterior fixation group and C2-4 incision +internal fixation group was significantly smaller than that of Hangman group and posterior fixation group in all six directions under various loading conditions (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between anterior fixation group and C2-4 incision +internal fixation group. ROM of posterior fixation group was larger than that of intact group in all six directions under various loading conditions (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in flexion and extension direction under all loading conditions between posterior fixation group and Hangman group, but significant difference was found in left/right and right/left axial rotation and under 2.5 N•m moment between posterior fixation group and Hangman group (P<0.05). (2) C3-4 segment: there was no significant difference in ROM in six directions under various loading conditions among all groups except for C2-4 incision +internal fixation group. ROM of C2-4 incision +internal fixation group was significantly smaller than that of other groups in all six direction (P<0.05). Although ROM of anterior fixation group was slightly larger than that of Hangman group and posterior fixation group, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions From the view of biomechanics, internal fixation after C3 corpectomy and C2-4 anterior fusion with Zephir plate is a better surgical option for stabilizing the fracture than that of posterior internal fixation by C2 transpedicle screws to treat type II Hangman fracture with C2-3 intervertebral disc injury.